Hmm
Here a clot, there a clot, everywhere a ...
Actually this is just a short one (to extent I can do such a thing) — sharing something that struck me in weekend catch-up reading.
Unclean, dirty people like me who dig around in the nether regions of counter narrative literature are pretty well aware of the signs congealing1 together on the subject of blood clotting from mandated covid injections — for example:
Or
etc. So with these observations sitting in our pockets while reading Pierre Kory’s latest:
Which actually I would encourage everyone to read through — he laments time spent in going through the snake venom stuff as being time lost, however I would say he completely recovers the value of that time many fold, by presenting the thought process as he works through the arguments there.
EVERYBODY needs to read this way. Including what I am typing now, including the links I present above, especially including what is presented as News, especially the things you assume are coming from a trusted source. People don’t know how to do this. Embarrassingly many with “Dr” in their name don’t know how to do this. And that is how we get to the batsh*t crazy place we’re in now.
We need to figure out how to teach kids to do this. Jr high-age kids probably. Channel those first buds of doubt of authority and that inherent assholedness of early teens into some kind of “Question everything and in doing so build a solid foundation” sort of curriculum2. This is of course completely contrary to the purpose of public schooling unfortunately.
But I digress — one of the things that hit me in Dr Kory’s post was the following — quoting, where he’s enumerating his running comments on the whole snake venom thing (second #5):
Also, I have never seen blood clotting like I did in the first Wuhan strain in 2020. Clotting became less severe and less prevalent with successive variants (but still a problem, just not like the first wave, that was insane with young people dying of massive pulmonary embolisms and right heart failure in ER’s).
Now this is something I’d like to hear more about (to the extent anybody wants to hear about anything like that). Here is someone who was (still is) directly in the trenches in that fight, talking about clotting having been very extreme from the first Wuhan strain in particular. As in the strain on which the mRNA injections were built? Oh Really?
Observations like this are Data. Data is what should be driving science. Seems here data like this should direct eyes toward looking hard at similarities between the early disease and the mandated things derived from that disease? And implications toward (well actually against) safety of the things derived from the disease?
BUT it also says we can’t, for example, just take an embalmer’s observation of clots as a slam dunk proof the injections did that. Looks like (at least) early disease also did that. Gotta build a correlation matrix including past infections and injections. Something we likely can’t do due to real or feigned incompetence of the keepers of that data.
Anyway — had to loft that ball out there before I got too distracted by the week. Likely others have already seen it, but thought it an interesting dashed line to perhaps put between some dots.
I mean the word I really wanted to use here is “clotting” but that’d be too obvious
Maybe a required class…. Called “Devil’s Advocate”. In it the kids come up with some number of things they have been told are true but they don’t believe to be true. Maybe can be any topic, but realistically probably have to put some constraints there to keep from going to jail. The exercise of the class then is for the kids to from first principles and documented evidence disprove those things. Teacher’s role is to both instruct them how to do this and then utterly destroy every argument the kids come up with through also first principle based counter argument. Oh I can see the lawsuits fly.